From: bill yan <Xue-Yang.Yan@Sun.COM>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Ocaml and lablgtk interface committed or not?
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:41:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48718269.9040204@sun.com> (raw)
Hi,
Just a general question, Are Ocaml and lablgtk interfaces committed? I
mean whether Ocaml and lablgtk interfaces(command and library) always
backward compatible? Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Bill
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-07 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 2:41 bill yan [this message]
2008-07-07 11:41 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2008-07-07 14:47 ` Sylvain Le Gall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48718269.9040204@sun.com \
--to=xue-yang.yan@sun.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).