From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E733BBAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:02:17 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4DALTxI0mK54gDgWdsb2JhbACPDIRLAQEWIr9Pgnk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,633,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="19345792" Received: from rouge.crans.org ([138.231.136.3]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Nov 2008 20:02:16 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.crans.org [127.0.0.1]) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3523185D5 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:02:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crans.org Received: from rouge.crans.org ([10.231.136.3]) by localhost (rouge.crans.org [10.231.136.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZMyQcfAhvxt9 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:02:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [88.185.141.188] (korell.glondu.net [88.185.141.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EEE85CF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:02:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <492462B7.4000202@glondu.net> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:02:15 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3TDqXBoYW5lIEdsb25kdQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081018) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included References: <1227002178.6170.25.camel@Blefuscu> <200811181817.23216.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20081118185914.GA20702@annexia.org> <200811182017.36574.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20081118192241.GA23062@annexia.org> <8231B9AC-C4D4-4BD4-9978-5D71763A9F17@erratique.ch> <20081118215014.GA25781@annexia.org> <20081119134807.GD1646@usha.takhisis.invalid> In-Reply-To: <20081119134807.GD1646@usha.takhisis.invalid> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=FCE03DAA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 zacchiroli:01 compilation:01 phane:98 steph:98 phane:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 executables:01 hierarchy:03 checksum:04 size:95 stefano:05 installed:05 depend:07 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Still, the idea of doing the pack on the client-side is an interesting > one. [...] >=20 > BUT >=20 > that would horribly break down with checksum assumptions, I believe. It would also mean someone's executables (contents and size) will depend on the libraries installed during the compilation, which is even worse. --=20 St=C3=A9phane