* QPL license issue on toplevel
@ 2008-11-24 16:28 Zheng Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Zheng Li @ 2008-11-24 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OCaml Mailing List
Dear list,
I'm working towards a pure library version of the enhtop (an enhanced
toplevel). I have some question about the toplevel's license of OCaml (QPL).
IMHO, OCaml toplevel allows to dynamic load libraries that are
distributed *independently* under other licenses (even GPL or
proprietary ones). I'm not sure about the _official_ understanding to
this, but I guess that loading in toplevel is considered as
- end-user dynamic linking
- or execution
If we neither build the libraries and toplevel into one binary (via
ocamlmktop) to distribute, nor do we wrap their source code as a bundle
for delivery, we don't have to face any license issue. Is that correct?
Then how about a library that explicitly calls some toplevel functions
(e.g. Topmain.xxx). This might be considered as "intend to link with
XXX", so must such a library be always released under QPL? (One
counterexample might be camlp4, part of which calls toplevel functions
and is released under LGPL, but it comes from the same team anyway ...)
Another option (if I want to avoid QPL) is to use reflection, so that
the library don't have to call toplevel functions explicitly, but it
still requires to work inside a toplevel (or together with a toplevel
library). However I doubt whether this trick (or say cheating) is
considered valid. Any precedents?
Thanks.
--
Zheng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-11-24 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-24 16:28 QPL license issue on toplevel Zheng Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).