From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F1EBC57 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:47:22 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao0EADth7UtKfVI0gGdsb2JhbACdfggVAQEUJCKtXYIAhHMuiE0BAQMFhQsE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,233,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="50640711" Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 May 2010 23:47:22 +0200 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1972727wwb.39 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=oFkvTEk/IKlPnYj6I2bzu96JW/0MFy7bmRGqwRda7dk=; b=KNPG6r/bxFdUCUXbQ+Tddik1Ql2nom4uTpvDiuRJLJKcee9UPzPNcaHwB/j2HpCydK qtGyzZSfssEzeC1q2QSyjc6GDNQJdkcXlW5jMo+oXdkfW3BGpgFayC3X6dwT6u1nj8DY RIS7XWq1hIzEkrL8bm60g+VqQPFtuI28TdybY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=SYxMYPC5lKqnmBt4+vbuzftpG0bBf3OONYj+8TsssQRWfmcNw2UTe1oBisJPHywVFD sajSrG00kO+g9qalOM7TQX6BtKFq4Bze7GXkFvigryQC8qieVuAxgdWVQz8p0GJ6EzUW F/gW0hOLv6o+gGC19UP/2Cg050cpp4n8RDdXA= Received: by 10.227.141.201 with SMTP id n9mr1808371wbu.31.1273873641564; Fri, 14 May 2010 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (tui75-1-81-57-73-233.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.73.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z33sm19309733wbd.19.2010.05.14.14.47.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 May 2010 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Message-Id: <49505E67-4974-4F0B-A6B7-0E87214E92BB@gmail.com> From: Vincent Aravantinos To: Raoul Duke In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 23:47:18 +0200 References: <088201caf1ce$b5060cb0$1f122610$@com> <20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net> <012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com> <87fx1uh5r5.fsf@frosties.localdomain> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Spam: no; 0.00; bytecode:01 ecosystem:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 talks:03 fri:05 fri:05 somewhere:06 ecrit:06 long:06 vincent:07 vincent:07 ported:07 complexity:09 Le 14 mai 10 =E0 23:42, Raoul Duke a =E9crit : > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Raoul Duke > Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL > To: ben kuin > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM, ben kuin wrote: >> but that would be the big benefit of a clr like vm: It doesn't matter >> how messed up, chaotic or just heterogen the environment is as long =20= >> as >> you can count on a regular execution of your portable bytecode. > > of course it matters: there must be the resources to get the vm ported > across all the fubar variations of the ecosystem. the combinatorics > has to be dealt with somewhere. that kind of complexity is less in the > hegemonic windows os world, i hypothesize. Please. You're not talking about the same thing. Ben talks about the =20 benefits such a vm would have once it would be done, you talk about =20 how hard it would be to do it.=