caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dawid Toton <d0@wp.pl>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What is a future of ocaml?
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:44:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <496DEC48.7000906@wp.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231924711.2711.11.camel@serphost.localdomain>

Few days ago I spent some time googling for any info in the subject and 
found nothing (except assigned feature requests in the tracer).

Would be great to know what should be expected about OCaml in a long term.
I understand that there's no manpower to push the core compiler forward 
faster. But it would be a solace to know that there are at least some 
optimistic plans with a broader horizon.

(say, following is a collection of dreams :))

Is there any hope for a grand 'OCaml 4' release that would iron out the 
last ugly spots left in the language with some breaking changes?

E.g.:
Have immutable strings for everyday use and mutable byte arrays as buffers?

Full support for revised syntax? (Error messages, documentation...)

Make modules practically first-class by devising some standard way of 
automatic module to record conversion?

Make record fields acting as projection functions?

Could anybody explain why it's impossible to have type classes in OCaml?
We have few very special operators like (=), is there any chance to make 
them less magic and work out anything that would satisfy basic needs for 
overloading?

Dawid


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-14 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-14  9:18 Radzevich Belevich
2009-01-14  9:35 ` [Caml-list] " David Allsopp
2009-01-14  9:51 ` Richard Jones
2009-01-14 13:34 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2009-01-14 13:44 ` Dawid Toton [this message]
2009-01-14 15:37   ` [Caml-list] " Martin Jambon
2009-01-14 15:39   ` David Allsopp
2009-01-15 12:13     ` Jacques Garrigue
2009-01-15 12:46       ` Benedikt Grundmann
2009-01-15 22:20         ` Oliver Bandel
2009-01-16 14:56           ` Kuba Ober
2009-01-15 12:51       ` David Allsopp
2009-01-15 21:08       ` Stefan Monnier
2009-01-14 16:07   ` [Caml-list] " Jérémie Dimino
2009-01-14 17:28   ` Dario Teixeira
2009-01-15 17:50     ` Richard Jones
2009-01-15 17:46   ` Richard Jones
2009-01-18 16:34     ` Xavier Leroy
2009-01-18 18:02       ` Richard Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=496DEC48.7000906@wp.pl \
    --to=d0@wp.pl \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).