From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MISSING_HEADERS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B0DBB84 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:04:28 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4FAGTGj0mBrw8EgWdsb2JhbACNDYYQgRwBARYiuhSEGgY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,405,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="20843308" Received: from ext.lri.fr ([129.175.15.4]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Feb 2009 15:04:28 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ext.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137F7A43B0 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:04:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lri.fr Received: from ext.lri.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext.lri.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8a26iwTzFdKr for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:04:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.lri.fr (vhost3-23 [129.175.3.23]) by ext.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B60A43AA for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:04:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [129.175.4.107] (lri4-107 [129.175.4.107]) by smtp.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED047E056F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:04:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <499037FA.1090603@lri.fr> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:04:42 +0100 From: Romain Bardou User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: OCaml List Subject: Re: ocamlbuild documentation (was Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3) References: <1233936696.6216.65.camel@Blefuscu> <200902071458.45000.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <498FF839.6090901@lri.fr> <499018C2.9080007@lri.fr> <499026F9.3030708@lri.fr> <997E6911-3D37-4FAA-A958-757AD21A9F4D@erratique.ch> <49902E11.2010101@lri.fr> <0520EBEC-B30C-4D83-9153-A72BC3C986BF@erratique.ch> <499036C6.5070504@lri.fr> In-Reply-To: <499036C6.5070504@lri.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; lri:01 ocaml:01 wiki:01 wiki:01 explicitely:01 caml-list:01 api:02 api:02 talks:03 sentence:04 indeed:07 examples:07 examples:07 function:08 batteries:91 > Indeed, it is not exactly said and should be added in the API > documentation, but because the API documentation is not a wiki, I cannot > do that, and neither can you. However, the "Making plugins" page of the > wiki does contain this sentence: "This is usually done After_rules." in > the "Manage tags" part. It is true that it does not mention explicitely > the "flag" function, but along with the examples it should be clear > enough. Isn't it? Sorry, I answered too fast: "flag" is really different than "tag", so my answer is kind of silly here ;) However, there ARE some examples in the part which talks about "flag", where we clearly see an usage (After_rules). -- Romain Bardou