From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF957BBAF for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:18:31 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsQHANcy3ElQDPIbYmdsb2JhbACQBYYPFwsDBQcTA7cQg3sGh0E X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,431,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="27284589" Received: from smtp20.orange.fr ([80.12.242.27]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2009 14:18:31 +0200 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2011.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2153C2000ED0; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:18:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (APuteaux-154-1-94-82.w83-204.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.204.229.82]) by mwinf2011.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E833020000B7; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:18:29 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20090408121829951.E833020000B7@mwinf2011.orange.fr Message-ID: <49DC9613.1030409@frisch.fr> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:18:27 +0200 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bertrand.desmons@umons.ac.be Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] (no subject) References: <1498.86.208.86.61.1239191966.squirrel@86.208.86.61> In-Reply-To: <1498.86.208.86.61.1239191966.squirrel@86.208.86.61> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; frisch:01 frisch:01 cygwin:01 cygwin:01 symlink:01 wrote:01 symbolic:01 caml-list:01 alain:01 alain:01 recognizes:05 strange:08 file:11 directory:11 should:13 DESMONS Bertrand wrote: > It is really strange for me... 'ls' recognizes liblapack.a, but I don't > see it using 'dir' ... ? There is also no liblapack.a.lnk, but isn't that > due to the fact that liblapack.a is a symbolic link? As far as I understand Cygwin, if liblapack.a is a Cygwin symlink, there should really be a file liblapack.a.lnk in the directory. I don't understand what is going on. -- Alain