From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429FBBC37 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:45:01 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtQBAFcqoErRVdOrkGdsb2JhbACSA4h8PwEBAQEJCQwHEwOsd4EnkCcBAwIEhBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,329,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="32180295" Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.211.171]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2009 05:45:00 +0200 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so1149857ywh.9 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:44:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fdgMQB/kmKoT+FYi48jD6uMo2bKi+WL4bm0vz3negFs=; b=wGk9QHCknuWe8qLXlVMNk1kn9XURl0kRazMANKUtV38xK82KmztbLhtMZHObVeNgwg n6xpF730kLGnbOpoM9RG5lKIxrqxr39dbEtY7Yk/0YZJZLyhyVJzb1CBnlSfPGzGygh/ BP5ufGPOAI2cOoyNfDOlgJFjPMUlTH6SjjSKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F3mESV3nX+Bf+dwrXOFY3lK+brryu74CqdMWsE2mYNft35b5JyCEeI1N7/U+8b1TVn 9M2ESJEjjTQO+U1eQKjiMW9Cg2LccF3D3BeG2pjw4iXtVjOZeTPDF3FuPBBXuLTzq9IR 6rJKihPwYlTGXiM+0CPT2pO8TgRBQo7K7C+fw= Received: by 10.90.13.15 with SMTP id 15mr2922572agm.74.1252035899744; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.98? ([72.44.99.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm993582agb.68.2009.09.03.20.44.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA08D37.2030002@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:44:55 -0400 From: Edgar Friendly User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? References: <4A9FBF04.1060608@gmail.com> <4AA00863.4060105@lri.fr> <2a1a1a0c0909032024i504ecec4p3938dbb95a6c3ad2@mail.gmail.com> <20090904133656.c8a635ac.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <20090904133656.c8a635ac.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml's:01 edgar:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 unix:01 caml-list:01 library:03 library:03 erik:04 erik:04 long:06 standard:07 probably:07 written:07 quite:08 Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Mike Lin wrote: > >> Ditto, >> Due to the sparsity of OCaml's standard library, many long term users >> probably have their own library to do all sorts of little things they need, >> and substantial amounts of code written around it. :-( > > Double ditto. I have quite a large amount of stuff sitting on top of > extlib/str/unix. > > Erik Would you consider donating any of it to batteries? E