From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82798BC37 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:58:05 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMBAK9pcUtV2gB4nGdsb2JhbACDCZdxAQEBAQEICwgJEyOtK5A+gS+CSlsEiVo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,438,1262559600"; d="scan'208";a="52235644" Received: from emailfrontal1.citycable.ch ([85.218.0.120]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 09 Feb 2010 22:58:05 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.12] (unknown [85.218.92.99]) (Authenticated sender: guillaume.yziquel@citycable.ch) by emailfrontal1.citycable.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1776312C21F; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:58:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B71DA88.8040902@citycable.ch> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:58:32 +0100 From: Guillaume Yziquel Reply-To: guillaume.yziquel@citycable.ch User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerd Stolpmann Cc: saptarshi.guha@gmail.com, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion References: <1e7471d51002091250of7a686fq537a03c9401c868f@mail.gmail.com> <1265752863.5482.42.camel@flake.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de> In-Reply-To: <1265752863.5482.42.camel@flake.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: no; 0.00; guillaume:01 guillaume:01 recursive:01 defintion:01 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 gerd:01 dienstag:98 rec:01 typing:01 caml-list:01 defining:02 let:03 let:03 specify:06 Gerd Stolpmann a =C3=A9crit : > Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 15:50 -0500 schrieb Saptarshi Guha: >=20 > Besides the different way of defining "let" and "let rec" there are als= o > differences in typing. Which ones? > Gerd --=20 Guillaume Yziquel http://yziquel.homelinux.org/