From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83355BC57 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:14:57 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,301,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="58218189" Received: from aspirine.inria.fr (HELO [128.93.60.41]) ([128.93.60.41]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2010 10:14:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4BDA9181.1080904@glondu.net> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:14:57 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane_Glondu?= User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20091109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David MENTRE Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: About Cryptokit (was: Re: [Caml-list] Re: SHA1 => stdlib ?!) References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; stdlib:01 compositions:01 cheers:01 steph:98 cryptokit:01 cryptokit:01 caml-list:01 modify:05 ecrit:06 stephane:07 stephane:07 blocks:07 useful:09 however:13 some:14 David MENTRE a écrit : > I also used Cryptokit once. It was pretty useful and easy to use. > However I had to modify a few lines in it in order to allow me to do > some compositions with Cryptokit building blocks. Could you be more specific? Cheers, -- Stéphane