From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eliot@colba.net>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B11DBC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 26 May 2010 15:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq8CAO+7/EvY/EBGWmdsb2JhbACeHgsBFgsOFAQewFqFEwSMQg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,304,1272837600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="51243930"
Received: from mailhost1.enter-net.com ([216.252.64.70])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 May 2010 15:18:21 +0200
Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 13842 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 13:20:37 -0000
Received: from 46-74-252-216.dsl.colba.net (HELO [192.168.0.100]) (eliot@[216.252.74.46])
          (envelope-sender <eliot@colba.net>)
          by mailhost1.enter-net.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <thomas.hutchinson@sophia.inria.fr>; 26 May 2010 13:20:37 -0000
Message-ID: <4BFD1F99.2010009@colba.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:18:17 -0400
From: Eliot Handelman <eliot@colba.net>
Reply-To: eliot@colba.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Hutchinson <thomas.hutchinson@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: blue storm <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com>,
	tuareg-mode@googlegroups.com, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr,
	Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] new emacs tuareg mode release
References: <4BFAAB04.40906@gnu.org>	<AANLkTim5t-mFmc_D4-xSYF2FsPyBdOA3LweR7b_-b8IM@mail.gmail.com> <ACF6E28A-52C8-4068-A8A3-589D40FB19CE@sophia.inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <ACF6E28A-52C8-4068-A8A3-589D40FB19CE@sophia.inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; emacs:01 tuareg:01 tuareg:01 emacs:01 multiline:01 colorization:01 hutchinson:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 ugly:04 differences:06 differences:06 release:09 comments:10 

Tom Hutchinson wrote:
> I would be most interested to hear answers to this e-mail.
>
> I too have wondered about the differences between tuareg mode and caml mode.
>   
One of the major differences I found (emacs 22.3.1) were persistent 
screwups involving comments. For
example font-lock didn't work on multiline comments. This gave all 
comments an ugly random
colorization. I was very happy to discover this had been fixed in tuareg.




-- eliot