From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FF6BBAF for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:08:31 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAAdUPUyK54gDgWdsb2JhbACDHpALjEMVAQEWIiKuR5EbgSmDCXIEiFA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,202,1278280800"; d="scan'208";a="63791879" Received: from rouge.crans.org ([138.231.136.3]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 Jul 2010 15:08:30 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.crans.org [127.0.0.1]) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696238075 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:08:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crans.org Received: from rouge.crans.org ([10.231.136.3]) by localhost (rouge.crans.org [10.231.136.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Zbgu2oJ6wSEE for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.20.196.79] (cpat002.wlan.net.ed.ac.uk [129.215.5.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E68F806E for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:08:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C3DB6CC.5060709@glondu.net> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:08:28 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3TDqXBoYW5lIEdsb25kdQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100620 Icedove/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Caml Light license in 2010 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: no; 0.00; gmane:01 gmane:01 phane:98 steph:98 23,:98 phane:98 caml-list:01 caml:02 caml:02 qpl:05 discussion:06 michael:07 sufficient:08 seem:08 comp:08 Le 14/07/2010 01:23, Michael Ekstrand a =C3=A9crit : > [...] I seem to remember a discussion about whether or not a > VCS is sufficient distinction to meet the requirements of the QPL, but > do not remember its outcome. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.caml.general/42200 --=20 St=C3=A9phane