From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p2PGELrj024457
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:14:21 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0DAHO+jE3RVaE0kGdsb2JhbACYVox3CBQBAQEBCQkNBxQEIagbilSCIYUtL4hcAQEDBYVkBIx1g1RzhEI6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,243,1299452400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="91139048"
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Mar 2011 17:14:21 +0100
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1712806fxm.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=S4mCd3iYyg0VzD7i37f7BCVnEOhKN62hBdteXBTMhbE=;
        b=v/E44yHgN6h8k3/vlo//T7sbuUF5/jEXneBL3HuznHnauuCeZheqoPU7qfm9DsSoVR
         G++LhEjwQURxgbkr8r77G3ak9mLY2MQ+7BVz1ppKMwJ47S7ldqC/I6y9TW6ypDbtH0DF
         0ixtif6BJLPU31cq6bcw94OiNzlKG0lt1uito=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=dYU/IJi3zr+Ztc/LWOXjHjYZ6gqKW/KC184rapUc+YDDBI+rY/rpcinwNuQ9+y6SWm
         6q2Oaudubq1Jcu+si2W4UVT75zTygcPw87auUlwv0Hqy9CV9mO2T1rcXJ3XvMYS593Rn
         kpvz2a87C3Sb1Za7g6ljAXoBXiA2+qG3Wz2MQ=
Received: by 10.223.6.11 with SMTP id 11mr1074978fax.93.1301069660189;
        Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (249.51.197-77.rev.gaoland.net [77.197.51.249])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm487741fae.23.2011.03.25.09.14.18
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D8CBF59.9000608@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:14:17 +0100
From: Matthieu Dubuget <matthieu.dubuget@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101218 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: florent.ouchet@imag.fr
CC: Caml Mailing List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
References: <4D8C5071.2000403@gmail.com> <4D8C684D.3040702@imag.fr> <4D8C6C5D.8000502@gmail.com> <4D8C9130.6000009@imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4D8C9130.6000009@imag.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Java JVM is becoming more strict

Le 25/03/2011 13:57, Florent Ouchet a écrit :
>
> Then you should never use standard pipes within a Windows GUI 
> application unless you're 100% sure that a console will always be 
> available (either attached or allocated).
Well, strictly speaking, I do not use it, ;-). There was just an unused 
function  in my code that had a dependence on Printf…

And what triggered my problem was the new version of the JVM.

My original post was only to warn others and for archives, if it can 
have somebody save time some day, because it was rather difficult to 
diagnose in the real world, compared to my abstract.

Salutations

Matthieu