From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3AJRKUL029498
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:27:20 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AloCAH0Dok3UTWUIimdsb2JhbACETKFRFAEBAQgLDQcSBiGIeqd7gl8BjEQFgSmDTXiROg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,334,1299452400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="92614862"
Received: from mx4.wp.pl ([212.77.101.8])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Apr 2011 21:27:15 +0200
Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 11810 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 21:27:13 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wp.pl; s=1024a;
          t=1302463633; bh=RRpOfB73vmW+S1jzZureSk0lEq9ZTDynzndWWDZbvN0=;
          h=From:To:Subject;
          b=R62ct3t12Tun7utT87/iRuYHe8YidvQ2L//ZtgbD6ANz660EOxzFzui6Ev2i3Z3Ww
           R5DVmH7CKv2Cc0ZluHlN1XV8h5QejZbHdMsQ1Uy9lsCyVA1hOTZmOqYfYSWMVmp/c2
           S+DttVFkcGxFJV40lVmJpmA9nMskMPRcEF1K9EDc=
Received: from 18-161.2-0.pl (HELO [192.168.1.101]) (d0@[91.189.18.161])
          (envelope-sender <d0@wp.pl>)
          by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP
          for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; 10 Apr 2011 21:27:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4DA20490.2070508@wp.pl>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:27:12 +0200
From: Dawid Toton <d0@wp.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
References: <BANLkTikFGZiFC38myqXpftF_Lb-2VLnj2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikFGZiFC38myqXpftF_Lb-2VLnj2A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A.
X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000000 [wdPU]                               
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml standard library: past, present, future


> I know there are some projects of building such complete library out
> there. I've heard at least of Batteries. I know also some companies
> are working on improving OCaml. So when are at least part of these
> libraries (the ones that the upstream core team consider high-quality
> enough) included into the upstream distribution?
So you want some libraries to be put in one tarball together with the 
compiler?
Why don't you like them packaged separately?

Dawid