From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3TAtF8d020988 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:55:15 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoYDAG+Yuk1KfVI0imdsb2JhbACYSY0zCBQBAQEKCQ0HEgYhiHGgZ4p8gieFIzSIXgEBAwaFeASOaIQXgQ6FDzuDLQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,287,1301868000"; d="scan'208";a="107068352" Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 29 Apr 2011 12:55:10 +0200 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so4940095wwe.9 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:55:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mqz9lPZib4Qwumb7ztSnUGro384/PnUIrbQyYBDefpg=; b=i3lFdpGW8JQ4eylZwO5dSdHZChbVKbIPK1N8XZ/0mbkJPyQonHcSXXFOUvtEM8k1mn 8636zfJYpVM4QfqpMj9HYrfZ16/5zYOCechb5E4EliGn3Q+MunWtEaUjH6p4RTusEWqi 1SyFN32yCHex4Y85VTyir41b5nAVhHHYovwpA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uYa2B6UnY66BWU37uGBYGWBBpbwkmPJkHwGC0szARS2/5bYqeJjm3Bq7VN9S0egAas qgP+8lc05Imu4CW1l20v/ODazTSQM227xzVcki0ZyAI6vgyE3eTBeoMyq/+XfiTfoivg luBXYEVqliuU202M3hPD2Ev9qLmpbqX7MAECU= Received: by 10.216.165.144 with SMTP id e16mr469096wel.71.1304074510058; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:55:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.186] ([93.7.165.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z13sm1629748wbd.29.2011.04.29.03.55.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DBA98D8.5020605@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:54:16 +0200 From: Andrew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <164004794.892685.1304067487325.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr> <20110429093355.GA25892@yquem.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <20110429093355.GA25892@yquem.inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comparing variant types > type dir = Left | Right | Up | Down | No_op > > let dir_equal d1 d2 = match d1,d2 with > | (Left, Left) > | (Right,Right) > | (Up, Up) > | (Down,Down) > | (No_op,No_op) > -> true > | (Left,(Right|Up|Down|No_op)) > | (Right,(Left|Up|Down|No_op)) > | (Up,(Left|Right|Down|No_op)) > | (Down,(Left|Right|Up|No_op)) > | (No_op,(Down|Up|Right|Left)) > -> false Why not write directly let dir_equal = fun d1 d2 -> | Left Left | Right Right | Up Up | Down Down | No_op No_op -> true | _ -> false ?