From: Philippe Strauss <philou@philou.ch>
To: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
Cc: <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: ocamlopt LLVM support (Was: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:45:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBB68C2-19CA-4222-913D-B6B26B780ED7@philou.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cb001cb9330$328102a0$978307e0$@com>
mostly fftw using christophe troessler binding and a kind of plain convolution, actully very comparable to plain convolution 100% in caml (not using any c binding).
plus minor things like binary search, vector multiplications etc. (audio DSP).
Le 3 déc. 2010 à 22:22, Jon Harrop a écrit :
> Philippe wrote:
>> I'm totally noob on compilers internals, but if the processing of float
>> arrays can be improved a lot by a LLVM ocamlopt, I would use it
>> exclusively.
>
> LLVM's x86 code gen will generate more efficient floating point code than
> ocamlopt if and only if the type information is available to it. With
> OCaml's current design, that is unlikely and you'll still have things like
> the 16Mb limit.
>
> What algorithms are you running?
>
> Cheers,
> Jon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-03 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-30 8:36 OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-30 10:48 ` [Caml-list] " Török Edwin
2010-11-30 10:55 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-30 17:01 ` bluestorm
2010-11-30 17:26 ` Török Edwin
2010-11-30 18:27 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2010-11-30 17:29 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-30 17:32 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-30 22:06 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-30 22:48 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-01 14:11 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-01 15:00 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-01 22:03 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-02 1:17 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-12-03 10:03 ` ocamlopt LLVM support (Was: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT) Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-03 13:34 ` Till Varoquaux
2010-12-03 13:41 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-12-03 14:06 ` Török Edwin
2010-12-03 21:16 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 16:44 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-03 14:32 ` Philippe Strauss
2010-12-03 21:22 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-03 21:45 ` Philippe Strauss [this message]
2010-12-03 15:32 ` Michael Ekstrand
2010-12-03 21:34 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-03 20:07 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 16:37 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-05 16:57 ` Török Edwin
2010-12-05 20:54 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-05 20:12 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 21:21 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-05 21:44 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-06 22:38 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-05 22:41 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-12-05 22:34 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-12-06 8:27 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-12-06 9:28 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2010-12-06 11:08 ` Richard Jones
2010-12-06 20:18 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-01 0:16 ` [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-12-01 1:34 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-12-01 12:58 ` Jon Harrop
2010-12-01 13:55 ` ivan chollet
2010-11-30 21:19 ` Jon Harrop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBB68C2-19CA-4222-913D-B6B26B780ED7@philou.ch \
--to=philou@philou.ch \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).