From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3UBXhpE026789
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:33:43 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcDAFfzu01KfVI0imdsb2JhbACYUo0+CBQBAQEKCQ0HEgYhiHGfHIp8giqEKDSIXgEBAwaFegSOeYQZgQ6FEzuDLw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,292,1301868000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="107133389"
Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 30 Apr 2011 13:33:38 +0200
Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so5976814wwe.9
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=my1P4JI/CQwNexx3ktTQe2ntO3Rs5qyEiGP5CeHt6Cg=;
        b=rJx6OGHO+7ktYi1R7W31y89Zjh3rSImePiWMiYh3++w1Vb+xnL15N9TfCWx6hvHR2o
         ActKNVZ1cXyvhhi74BozZ637z3u8YqtxZ77/PDtU/S92qBAt7/leG9DVNr9xK8RcTY01
         YQqZXnrBhDwZVf1k6OWQwTGAyk2wdqjrjCdKU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=SoyvvpnVIsp6TsZnpA56GJhj3bYm65bIaZVUhTUxLs5IHFOivXgzx1cBP5S8Sf/iQi
         u6RBe1WYhGXNIiGeQgAUTXcWGDYGAByqV48HydzLA0ixLuejO6cuLc+bQPMZAzbA/1lV
         4iYiyljCEC4cAqZmUFh775lsJdPN9xBQfSBXw=
Received: by 10.227.131.208 with SMTP id y16mr1925618wbs.43.1304163217964;
        Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.186] ([93.7.165.241])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z13sm2222999wbd.12.2011.04.30.04.33.36
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 30 Apr 2011 04:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DBC0FAF.8030200@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:33:35 +0200
From: Andrew <newsgroups.fr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <4DBBE676.8070101@univ-savoie.fr> <4DBBEF0B.2050204@univ-savoie.fr> <4DBBF1D8.6020105@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DBBF1D8.6020105@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] portablility of random.mli in the stdlib

> Why should a random generator give the same results over multiple
> versions and architectures?
> Starting from same seed is useful only for debugging.
>

In designing a game, you might find it convenient to use a given seed to encode a sequence of numbers (eg. level one is 
random seed 1524).

Another field where that could be useful is statistics; being able to reproduce your results is absolutely crucial. 
Taking random values is fine, but you can' just say you obtained a result without telling others how to reproduce it.

Andrew.