caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stéphane Glondu" <steph@glondu.net>
To: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
Cc: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi.dogguy@pps.jussieu.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Warning: Ubuntu 11.04 Vs OCaml 3.12.0
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 00:32:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC0826C.6060101@glondu.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304459989.3782.193.camel@thinkpad>

Le 03/05/2011 23:59, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
> Well, Ubuntu is another case, as we all know that Ubuntu does not care
> about the quality of their ocaml packages.
> [...]
> Debian is in the lucky situation that they provide both the environment
> for ocaml and ocaml. So yes, they can fix the problems they created in
> their own environment :-) - Ubuntu is already a different story, they
> provide binary packages without any QA process.
> [...]
> Regarding Ubuntu, maybe we should ask them to remove their ocaml
> packages from their distribution as long as they do not do QA.

You sound like ocaml-related packages are totally broken in Ubuntu,
which is not true. They probably do more QA than GODI, even on
ocaml-related packages (e.g. frequent recompilations with new versions
of toolchain, early bug reporting when something breaks). But as you
pointed out, they have complete control over their OS... it would be
more difficult to do that for GODI. Sure, Ubuntu doesn't have a
dedicated ocaml maintainer, and copy their packages directly from Debian
and they should work most of the time (actually, I've never heard of
breakages that were specific to Ubuntu).

BTW, the ocaml package shipped by Ubuntu 11.04 has been fixed (it's
still version 3.11.2, though). The original mail of this thread was
about an ocaml compiled from sources.


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane



  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-03 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-03 16:36 Sebastien Mondet
2011-05-03 16:47 ` Gabriel Scherer
2011-05-03 17:49   ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-05-03 20:51     ` Mehdi Dogguy
2011-05-03 21:59       ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-05-03 22:32         ` Stéphane Glondu [this message]
2011-05-03 22:50           ` Gerd Stolpmann
2011-05-06 21:44 ` Till Crueger
2011-05-07  7:24   ` Virgile Prevosto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC0826C.6060101@glondu.net \
    --to=steph@glondu.net \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
    --cc=mehdi.dogguy@pps.jussieu.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).