From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Sympa-To: caml-list@inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p44FPTnS003428 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:25:29 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUEAGRvwU1KfVI0imdsb2JhbACEUJN5jUgIFAEBAQoJDQcSBiGoW4tcgmiFNIkSAQEDBoUAgQEEjzWEHIEOhSU7gSWCDQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,314,1301868000"; d="vcf'?scan'208";a="107450035" Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 May 2011 17:25:24 +0200 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so1650226wwe.9 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 08:25:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version :content-type; bh=JA+90Gi29IMpxdcp508N5fSeyo8T8bvmnP23DiMNAVk=; b=wQDtQ9uBfd4Zo0XCdJsd1YTU4h6yvnEtP6myXOXTmq1dJLU7bGhydOBBwkvZ/cjD1N 0yrKZ90Mh1M/VnqnNuh7W+UpYcMYdbKQ5CLGW3KQJ8xovkXvxz0tKnNvciqdRWXlEoWT jx73YogpamkMXBa6kcXe6s88iWN/T8opGZXHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=f1vWrDvyixBfn7QXjj56kBN60PhxUcvNI14Mug9nke+oqHHG6Gs347WN1ZlPiGk8QE 1v8lSu89+zcHv92kh//SCvjtQyxn05vEGUOX3crV/7r8o3shy2bEpZDkx6tyOCxxNoO3 WOfy64jY/IBdOgoEOPpWM1VHMZta6ZE7GAx8U= Received: by 10.216.254.90 with SMTP id g68mr1303297wes.16.1304522723714; Wed, 04 May 2011 08:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.93.60.63] (koch-irill.inria.fr [128.93.60.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j49sm623720wer.38.2011.05.04.08.25.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 May 2011 08:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Fabrice Le Fessant Message-ID: <4DC16FE0.3010804@inria.fr> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 17:25:20 +0200 From: Fabrice Le Fessant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <4DC10444.1060104@inria.fr> <1082521165.840718.1304517942954.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <1082521165.840718.1304517942954.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020001040609050902040306" X-Validation-by: fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Survey on OCaml usage/needs in the industry This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020001040609050902040306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/04/2011 04:05 PM, rixed@happyleptic.org wrote: >> we would be interested to >> hear about the reasons why your company chose OCaml for developing >> software > > What about a survey about why our companies chose _not_ to use OCaml ? > Wouldn't be useful as well ? Actually, it is part of the survey, but the question is about the "needs" of those who chose it, but it can also be seen as the reasons why your company chose not to use it, because those needs were not filled. Anyway, of course, if anybody is part of a company where a discussion happened about using or not OCaml, feel free to reply to the survey, as the questions are "opened", so that you can add comments wherever you want. Fabrice --------------020001040609050902040306 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="fabrice_le_fessant.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fabrice_le_fessant.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Fabrice LE FESSANT n:LE FESSANT;Fabrice org:INRIA Saclay -- Ile-de-France;P2P & OCaml adr;quoted-printable:;;Parc Orsay Universit=C3=A9 ;Orsay CEDEX;;91893;France email;internet:fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr title;quoted-printable:Charg=C3=A9 de Recherche tel;work:+33 1 74 85 42 14 tel;fax:+33 1 74 85 42 49 url:http://fabrice.lefessant.net/ version:2.1 end:vcard --------------020001040609050902040306--