From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pierre.weis@inria.fr>
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42970BC2F
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:08:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iATK8LPj014689
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:08:22 +0100
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA08895 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:08:21 +0100 (MET)
Received: from janus.eecs.berkeley.edu (janus.EECS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.48.150])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iATK8JhW016686
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:08:20 +0100
Received: by janus.EECS.Berkeley.EDU with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <W0L5L6S8>; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:08:19 -0800
Message-ID: <4E06A937DADC3842ACE4D3A1096A9EAC016AF38B@janus.EECS.Berkeley.EDU>
From: George Necula <necula@eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Difficulty tracking Not_found uncaught exception from Labltk
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:08:18 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41AB81B5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41AB81B3.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; uncaught:01 labltk:01 trivial:01 uncaught:01 backtrace:01 backtrace:01 hashtbl:01 hashtbl:01 callbacks:01 exception:01 exception:01 exceptions:01 eecs:01 callback:02 top-level:02 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.0
X-Spam-Level: 


 Hi,

   If I bind a trivial action to the `FocusIn event of a canvas, I get
"Uncaught exception: Not_found" printed on the console and nothing else. The
code that I write is shown below:

    Tk.bind ~events:[`FocusIn] ~fields:[`MouseX]
      ~action:(fun _ -> ignore (E.log "got the focus\n"))
      srccode

I was able to track this message to Protocol.protected_dispatch. I tried to
change this function to propagate the exception further so that the
top-level can print the backtrace. This did not work (the exception is still
intercepted by somebody else). I then tried to put a call to
call_print_exception_backtrace in the protected_dispatch function. This
printed a couple of "caller unknown" lines for the Hashtbl module (but with
a wrong line number?). 

 If I turn on Protocol.debug then all I see is "camlcb 29 0". Since I do not
see the << printed, this led me to believe that the problem is the
Hashtbl.find in Protocol.dispatch_callback. From there I was able to find my
problem: I was calling remove_callbacks afterwards. 

 Is there a better way to debug such intercepted exceptions? 

 Thanks,
George Necula.