caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David McClain <dbm@refined-audiometrics.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: JIT & HLVM, LLVM
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:18:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6F3027-5745-462D-AF10-30C868285D28@refined-audiometrics.com> (raw)

Ahh, I see from doing a bit more research that JIT does *not* run  
particularly faster than statically compiled code. But rather, it runs  
faster than interpreted byte-code.

I remember many years ago speaking with David Robson, over lunch,  
about the upcoming changes in Smalltalk, using a form of JIT to  
improve performance of their method dispatch, and attempting to gain  
multiple inheritance in that manner for Smalltalk. But there, again,  
it is a case of attempting to improve on an interpreted byte-code, and  
not a case of improving over statically compiled native code.

But with so many talented bodies working on LLVM, perhaps, in time, a  
way will be found to gain improvement over static native code.

Dr. David McClain
dbm@refined-audiometrics.com




             reply	other threads:[~2009-09-27 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-27 17:18 David McClain [this message]
2009-09-27 17:22 ` [Caml-list] " Vincent Aravantinos
2009-09-27 17:35   ` Edgar Friendly
2009-09-27 18:51     ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-27 19:07       ` Edgar Friendly
2009-09-27 19:23         ` kcheung
2009-09-27 19:33           ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-27 21:10           ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-27 21:45             ` Vincent Aravantinos
2009-09-30  1:08             ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-09-30 11:57               ` Stéphane Glondu
2009-09-30 12:54                 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-09-30 13:42                   ` Stéphane Glondu
2009-09-30 19:11                     ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-09-30 15:22               ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-30 19:35                 ` Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
2009-09-28 12:25     ` Gerd Stolpmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E6F3027-5745-462D-AF10-30C868285D28@refined-audiometrics.com \
    --to=dbm@refined-audiometrics.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).