From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p8DBZrO9023203 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:35:53 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqMGAPQ+b06Tr58C/2dsb2JhbABCmRyPRIJSPRYYAwIBAgFYCAKHdZg3n3SGbgSTPYUZjAs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,374,1312149600"; d="scan'208";a="119560317" Received: from gatekeeper.dcs.fiit.stuba.sk (HELO mail.fiit.stuba.sk) ([147.175.159.2]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2011 13:35:48 +0200 Received: from dcs.fiit.stuba.sk (dcs.fiit.stuba.sk [147.175.98.42]) by mail.fiit.stuba.sk (8.14.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id p8DBZlU1032469 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:35:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kosik@fiit.stuba.sk) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fiit.stuba.sk Received: from [10.0.0.4] (bband-dyn56.178-40-237.t-com.sk [178.40.237.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by dcs.fiit.stuba.sk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8DBZg3c001702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:35:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4E6F400C.8020303@fiit.stuba.sk> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:35:40 +0200 From: Matej Kosik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110818 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on dcs.fiit.stuba.sk X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.fiit.stuba.sk [147.175.99.1]); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:35:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Caml-list] interesting (unexpected) sideeffect Hi, I have noticed that when I compile my program with ocamlc -vmthread ... threads.cma ... options, then Unix.set_nonblock function does not work. I.e. Unix.recv function called with a given socket can block. Is this an intended behavior?