caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Nested module exposing type from parent?
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:41:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB1E325.4020207@ens-lyon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN=ouMSpOuajS2XGtX23M4S73C1XOa4LXZptexk+sh=YsLmauQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/02/2011 12:41 PM, Anthony Tavener wrote:
> I've been struggling with this occasionally...
> 
> I'm using nested modules to "open" access to select features of a
> module. My problem is I can't find a way to *expose* types in the parent
> module through such nested modules.
> 
> A simplified example of what I'm looking at:
> 
>   module Vec = struct
> 
>     type t = { x: int; y: int }
>     let make x y = {x;y}
>     let add a b = {x=a.x+b.x; y=a.y+b.y}
> 
>     module Type =
>       (* something which has type t = Vec.t,
>        * with exposed structure when "open"ed.
>        * Also note that Vec is not really an
>        * explicit module like this; instead it
>        * is implemented in vec.ml <http://vec.ml> *)
>   end
> 
> Example usage...
> 
>   let n = Vec.make 2 5
>   open Vec.Type
>   let m = {x=1;y=2}
>   Vec.add m n

I hope I understand the problem correctly.

In order for that code to work, you can do this:

module Vec = struct

  type t = { x: int; y: int }
  let make x y = {x;y}
  let add a b = {x=a.x+b.x; y=a.y+b.y}

  module Type = struct
    type t' = t = { x: int; y: int }
    type t = t' = { x: int; y: int }
    (* something which has type t = Vec.t,
     * with exposed structure when "open"ed.
     * Also note that Vec is not really an
     * explicit module like this; instead it
     * is implemented in vec.ml <http://vec.ml> *)
  end
end


Or more simply:


module Vec = struct

  module Type = struct
    type t = { x: int; y: int }
    (* something which has type t = Vec.t,
     * with exposed structure when "open"ed.
     * Also note that Vec is not really an
     * explicit module like this; instead it
     * is implemented in vec.ml <http://vec.ml> *)
  end

  type t = Type.t = { x: int; y: int }
  let make x y = {x;y}
  let add a b = {x=a.x+b.x; y=a.y+b.y}

end


Now you can open either Vec or Vec.Type and have direct access to the
record fields.


Martin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-03  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-02 19:41 Anthony Tavener
2011-11-02 20:19 ` Vincent Aravantinos
     [not found]   ` <CAN=ouMTApZjpU-CaZtdL4njXtmtRu++7fzJBJL3w3FRcHfjtSA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <CAN=ouMS9rqqNR3KgCBnnjC_HcMrUnftVw643mkmhC_vrpXfv1A@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-02 21:14       ` Fwd: " Anthony Tavener
2011-11-02 23:01         ` Gabriel Scherer
2011-11-03  0:06           ` Vincent Aravantinos
2011-11-03  1:03           ` Anthony Tavener
2011-11-03  0:41 ` Martin Jambon [this message]
2011-11-03  1:04   ` Anthony Tavener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB1E325.4020207@ens-lyon.org \
    --to=martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).