Re: [Caml-list] Include question

[Vincent Aravantinos <vincent.aravantinos@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 788 bytes --]



On 11/09/2011 10:41 AM, Vincent Aravantinos wrote:
> I actually wonder if they just *look* too complicated? Maybe because 
> they are verbose?
> Each time you define a functor you also have to give the signature of 
> its argument, which, compared to a simple "include" can look overkilling.
> Concretely:
>
> module A = struct
>   ...
> end
>
> module B = struct
>   include A
>   ...
> end
>
> VS
>
> module A = struct
>   ...
> end
>
> module type B_INPUT = sig
>   ... (can be big)
> end
>
> module Make_B (X:B_INPUT) = struct
>   ...
> end

This verbosity problem is actually less true since 3.12 with the 
introduction of "module type of":

module A = struct
   ...
end

module Make_B (X: module type of A) = struct
   ...
end

Which is then quite close to the "include" version.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1834 bytes --]