From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Sympa-To: caml-list@inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pB6CRqlY031292 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:27:53 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkICANUJ3k6K54gDi2dsb2JhbABEqlsiAQEBCgsLGyWBcgEBBTIBBTYKEQshFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgCEId7tSiIGoMYBJowjFc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,305,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="134151040" Received: from rouge.crans.org ([138.231.136.3]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Dec 2011 13:27:47 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.crans.org [127.0.0.1]) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A653685C2 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:27:45 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crans.org Received: from rouge.crans.org ([10.231.136.3]) by localhost (rouge.crans.org [10.231.136.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EKjzUdid2G1a for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:27:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [129.175.29.25] (lri29-25.lri.fr [129.175.29.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rouge.crans.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8746485C1 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:27:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EDE0A40.6090805@lri.fr> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:27:44 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Bobot?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <1B0D83BD-1902-4F7C-B3FB-B759122D6AB9@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Validation-by: bobot@lri.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml maintenance status / community fork Le 06/12/2011 12:40, Gabriel Scherer a écrit : > 3. What about infrastructure? > > > Short answer: Ocamlforge ( http://forge.ocamlcore.org/ ) for mailing > list, bug tracking and homepage, and Gitorious ( https://gitorious.org/ > ) for code repository hosting. > For reviewing, gerrit seems to be a great infrastructure (I never use it as a developer) : http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ ====== Gerrit is a web based code review system, facilitating online code reviews for projects using the Git version control system. Gerrit makes reviews easier by showing changes in a side-by-side display, and allowing inline comments to be added by any reviewer. Gerrit simplifies Git based project maintainership by permitting any authorized user to submit changes to the master Git repository, rather than requiring all approved changes to be merged in by hand by the project maintainer. This functionality enables a more centralized usage of Git. ====== You can see a review of a CyanogenMod patch : http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#change,10719 -- François Bobot