From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pB9Cb5gD012181 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:37:05 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgBAND/4U7B/BfSkWdsb2JhbABDqxsBAQEBCQsLBxQDIoFyAQEFODYKARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEFAgEBEId1ti+LcgSUcIVLjF0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,325,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="134716106" Received: from msa01.smtpout.orange.fr (HELO msa.smtpout.orange.fr) ([193.252.23.210]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2011 13:37:02 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([83.199.117.71]) by mwinf5d24 with ME id 70cy1i00V1YWU4b030cy9c; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:37:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4EE200E7.1040002@frisch.fr> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:36:55 +0100 From: Alain Frisch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Protzenko CC: Stefano Zacchiroli , caml-list@inria.fr References: <55531934-37A5-4CC5-AB67-20CE4CCE8269@googlemail.com> <1323427075.32238.91.camel@arrakis> <20111209111759.GB2594@upsilon.cc> <4EE1F605.1060903@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE1F605.1060903@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml maintenance status / community fork (again) On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, Jonathan Protzenko wrote: > Just for the record, caml@inria.fr also happens to be list where the > members of the Caml Consortium discuss their issues. There's potentially > private/sensitive information in there, and it's not always clear what > relates to the consortium member's interests, and what is more about > language design. So having a third list just to discuss language design > issues is not as easy as it seems. Actually, the Caml Consortium has its own mailing list (caml-consortium@inria.fr), separate from caml@inria.fr -- Alain