From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBAI0akb021713
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:00:36 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmMBAPad407U4xEKk2dsb2JhbABDqn4iAQEBAQkJCwkUAyKBcgEBAQQBAjVAEQshFg8JAwIBAgEWLxMIAQGIBga0XIhTgxoEkkyCJZIo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,332,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="122860314"
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2011 19:00:31 +0100
Received: from keller.hars.de (p4FF61EB4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.246.30.180])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0M2kFe-1Qj7Jg2rbC-00scbH; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:00:30 +0100
Received: from bessel.fritz.box ([192.168.178.33])
	by keller.hars.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <florian@hars.de>)
	id 1RZRDq-0003sn-6j
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:00:30 +0100
Message-ID: <4EE39E3D.2060206@hars.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:00:29 +0100
From: Florian Hars <florian@hars.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <CAHqiZ-+bDbKmakxt+f9P-FwMbwVcoYaaaUO2B_gQbqygfmfbgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPFanBHfiuyriTjjBVMoo7tUzWxdLgV-FtsUKHecVvFFwwLFTw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBHfiuyriTjjBVMoo7tUzWxdLgV-FtsUKHecVvFFwwLFTw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.178.33
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: florian@hars.de
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on keller.hars.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:E+yI8efU8w37PrsRe9hDUiTIugneEY06M2XESM6F2aX
 tqCP6EMMDb6n+Ute+okwHg4WJaVHJ2Yx8LGZddSApR+DyqsGvF
 hvxHYK4to4rRyl9090hRFR6cu4nyVtUK9h7ahIUY6i83Mucy6o
 jvjzxYW/4rcH+P2ZKXf+qUCt8uYWp8pdFKlGJOJc2QA6b5uLS7
 PeW4Xhtv8Fu1vdNT8IkofaZi7/rrKLT/n4W5WHRn+BqLmENW7D
 g5k/JjMFzhjyiZinVM1FqYQXWkIQrW/y9o7wEE3/CjeGCJU6Pq
 0cNJbWPz/0DELg2yP5AWm1qRvUZF29eEEyFuZosP6zcgNbaXQ=
 =
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why isn't there a common platform for functional
 language interaction ?

Am 10.12.2011 13:58, schrieb Gabriel Scherer:
> Moreover, it is basically impossible
> to move up the abstraction ladder (eg. provide common runtime
> components) without sacrificing universality or efficiency.

This might be relevant to the topic at hand:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dotgnu-general/2002-06/msg00197.html

- Florian.