From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBDDZNaL014236
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:35:24 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoBADZU507RVdW2kGdsb2JhbAAqGqsZCCIBAQEBCQkNBxQEIYFyAQEBBBICJAgBGxwCAwwGBQsNCRYPCQMCAQIBEREBBQEcEwgBARAOh2IjmGsKi2SCa4RrP4hxAgULiEODGgSIMIxBhU2BNIZzPYQW
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,345,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="123190801"
Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 13 Dec 2011 14:35:04 +0100
Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so7099249yen.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:35:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ROUMCYpR/75p7pVIS13qvYbf7MLpyk47G5gK4RzJqTs=;
        b=QMUtuHeLdIObuRqXd5znbyYF2xvgfw40hfl3PvQXmcN57TjV2mSNtWXYHJseAuwuvV
         QLhscJdM58Qk1UpgZhsxjbo7dCsWcVRBRURCqzL1mbAPwtne4PTXPLKJTsFeBTPYQ3Ke
         p6i5afTTCEiZfH/Ip3Al0mmZaElTIrqUs0Pvk=
Received: by 10.236.197.97 with SMTP id s61mr3651293yhn.57.1323783303908;
        Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:35:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (99-121-78-10.lightspeed.lnngmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.121.78.10])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f17sm59728878ang.20.2011.12.13.05.35.01
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EE7547F.9030806@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:34:55 -0500
From: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <4EE5EF49.80108@frisch.fr> <4EE5F883.2020103@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EE5F883.2020103@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About the "mingw" port of OCaml

On 12/12/2011 07:50 AM, Matthieu Dubuget wrote:
>
> I tried i686-w64-mingw32-gcc version in august, on a 32 bits system,
> starting from the patches attached to
> http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5179.
>
> I tested all those packages without problem:
>
> menhir, bitstring, ounit,ocamlcsv, frontc, xmllight, camomile,
> batteries, zlib, camlzip, lablgtk2, easy_format, atd, cppo, biniou,
> yojson, atdgen
>
> Salutations
>
> Matt
>
>
Hmm, I wonder how much the community would benefit from automated 
testing of ocaml packages under a variety of environments.  Batteries is 
definitely benefiting from ygrek's jenkins/hudson server[1] (although it 
must have stopped sending me emails again, as batteries HEAD is unhappy 
and I didn't get notification).

ygrek: could you use more build slaves?

E

[1] https://build.ygrek.org.ua/jenkins/