From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q1A8dhGd025552 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:39:44 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai4EAPbWNE9KfVI0imdsb2JhbABDgxGrYwFzCCIBAQEKCQ0HEgYjgXIBAQEEEgIkCAEbHAIDDAYFCw0JFg8JAwIBAgEREQEFARwTCAEBHoddnToKi3GCcIUUP4ELAgULihFagQYBBQQHAh0BCwEgAQIBAgGDX3+DHQSNZIdMhVqBOocPPYQD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,395,1325458800"; d="scan'208";a="130830661" Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 10 Feb 2012 09:39:38 +0100 Received: by wgbds10 with SMTP id ds10so2819207wgb.9 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:39:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ry9ImdwRxKi05YcvQUnvB+XQjg6+3R9QJ0tvPilVRbM=; b=P7Y8Z35aT2KByI+tB1u7Y4u3JfxLvAmuzXwfIDbORcMzOoW9s2iK3N945Irl5CvYrb Ve0MbqmCXX7MoxKWcJoa6CJVzQ9Ut8TkCYkRx+XBmwGSnsSEfxXv8t2PdTotow2L2+u5 jnHq2m3xQlsYRp53z3uVEGB2t1FqJ4WYaKblM= Received: by 10.180.95.1 with SMTP id dg1mr7720088wib.21.1328863178465; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:39:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.114] (75.252.8.93.rev.sfr.net. [93.8.252.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dr5sm15839263wib.0.2012.02.10.00.39.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:39:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F34D7CC.1000507@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:39:40 +0100 From: Andrew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <4F326EA6.20900@gmail.com> <4F32741C.4040501@janestreet.com> <20120208133926.GC1823@siouxsie> <4F327CBF.4030005@janestreet.com> <20120208135818.GG1823@siouxsie> <4F3282B1.1050205@janestreet.com> <4F328BCF.9030902@janestreet.com> <4F329274.7050500@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F329274.7050500@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] syntactic detail On 2012-02-08 16:19, Vincent Aravantinos wrote: > I'm curious: in which occasions do you guys really have to type in such numbers? +1, although I do when I declare a huge array of fixed size; but I usually write 10*1000*1000.