caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Nathan <andre@digirati.com.br>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] What am I reinventing here?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:33:41 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F399DD5.3000507@digirati.com.br> (raw)

Hello

I have some code that behaves like the following.

module M = struct
   type ('a, 'b) ops = {
     bar_of_foo : 'a -> 'b;
     foo_of_bar : 'b -> 'a
   }

   let foo ops x = ops.bar_of_foo x
   let bar ops x = ops.foo_of_bar x
end

type foo = A | B
type bar = C | D

let ops = {
   M.bar_of_foo = (function A -> C | B -> D);
   M.foo_of_bar = (function C -> A | D -> B)
}

let () =
   match M.foo ops A with
   | C -> ()
   | D -> ()

The idea is to parametrize the behavior of some module M on two types 
and a set of operations involving these two types, with the catch that I 
want to keep the ability to pattern-match on the possible values of 
these types in the code that handles the return values from the 
functions exported by M.

With the scheme above I can do this, but passing a table of functions 
around doesn't look very nice. Is there any way I can use functors to do 
what this code does, while still being able to use pattern-matching? 
Would I have to resort to objects to be able to do this?

Thanks in advance,
Andre

             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-13 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-13 23:33 Andre Nathan [this message]
2012-02-14  7:03 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2012-02-14  9:59   ` Andre Nathan
2012-02-14 10:09     ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-02-14 10:24       ` Andre Nathan
2012-02-14 10:39         ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-02-14 11:05           ` Andre Nathan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F399DD5.3000507@digirati.com.br \
    --to=andre@digirati.com.br \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).