From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q1R1CQLA000329
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 02:12:27 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqACAIXXSk+GoCGhhWdsb2JhbABCgwGtHoMpAQEBCgsLBRYngXMBAQU4QBELGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBiAK3IYl0EIMfDQERAgIHBgQDBAMIBAoPEQEDAwECAoUHAwV7gx4EiE2McIVdjSCBRQI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,488,1325458800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="133077166"
Received: from postman1.riken.jp (HELO postman.riken.jp) ([134.160.33.161])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 02:12:19 +0100
Received: from postman.riken.jp (postman1.riken.jp [127.0.0.1])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id CB4F932C01A1;
	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:12:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [172.27.98.103] (rikad98.riken.jp [134.160.214.98])
	by postman.riken.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B332632A008B;
	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:12:16 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <4F4AD870.3090402@riken.jp>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:12:16 +0900
From: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <000501ccf474$4d5c2590$e81470b0$@metastack.com>
In-Reply-To: <000501ccf474$4d5c2590$e81470b0$@metastack.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.0.2009776, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.2.27.4820
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Latest OCaml + Libraries on CentOS

On 02/26/2012 07:49 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
> I've comparatively recently upgraded from an embarrassingly old version of
> Fedora to CentOS 6.2. With only the default repositories enabled, the
> version of OCaml and number of packages available are a bit limited
> (especially compared with Fedora).
>
> Before I go ahead and just build what I want from source, can I ask any
> other users if there's a "better" way?

You should use GODI.

It will automate getting the dependencies and building
things from source.

Regards,
F.