From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Sympa-To: caml-list@inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q25C2KKN022776 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:02:20 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuYBAJSqVE+K57AEmWdsb2JhbABDtFYiAQEBAQEICwsHFCeBfQEBBAE4QAYLCyEWBAsJAwIBAgE3AQ0TCAIQh24Ftz+NO4MiBJsfjRU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,533,1325458800"; d="scan'208";a="134407707" Received: from ariane.ens-cachan.fr ([138.231.176.4]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Mar 2012 13:02:15 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ariane.ens-cachan.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B53BCA3B for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:00:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ens-cachan.fr Received: from ariane.ens-cachan.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ariane.ens-cachan.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id PSJeHhO3-mqH for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:00:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from olive.lsv.ens-cachan.fr (olive.lsv.ens-cachan.fr [138.231.81.248]) by ariane.ens-cachan.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1770BCA30 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:00:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [138.231.81.152] (unknown [138.231.81.152]) by olive.lsv.ens-cachan.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927B54C01A4 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:00:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F54AB4C.7090300@lsv.ens-cachan.fr> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:02:20 +0100 From: Romain Bardou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Validation-by: bardou@lsv.ens-cachan.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [community poll for PR#5312] Do some OCaml Windows users still use the @responsefile feature? > Wasn't aware it existed (in the runtime, I mean). It would seem to be an obsolete feature now - personally, I'd expect to have to implement @responsefile in a program of my own if I had some weird need for a Windows command line utility that accepted arguments over 8K. Same here, I was not aware of its existence. -- Romain Bardou