From: Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>
To: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] ocamlopt -g
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:06:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F56A686.5090108@ens-lyon.org> (raw)
Dear all,
Is there is any disadvantage of using -g with ocamlopt?
A number of libraries are not compiled with -g and this prevents us from
getting a complete stack backtrace when they raise an exception. Are
there technical reasons for that, other than "this is an old library and
we haven't touched the Makefile since ocamlopt offers -g"?
Martin
next reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 0:06 Martin Jambon [this message]
2012-03-07 0:54 ` Josh Berdine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F56A686.5090108@ens-lyon.org \
--to=martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).