From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q4F28ODa014632
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Tue, 15 May 2012 04:08:28 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQCAGK6sU9KfVK2kGdsb2JhbABEgx6wUwgiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCFgEBBBICHgEFCAEbHAIDDAYFCxYWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHBMIAQEeh10BAwsEB5xGCQOMJIJzhQsKGScNV4h2AQUMiwYFglWDJgSVfYERhGSIaz2EDg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,590,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="158380739"
Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 15 May 2012 04:08:27 +0200
Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so4754300wer.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 14 May 2012 19:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=H67cPuq9R0ibZzeBZ6foIA1IBPt/JLEOalGj6t/TAhE=;
        b=rBiawJESss/Ti3ppIUrdfWf7lQH9w1chk21bOmRaaCWJoVIyDTwM+2WsZ9OLcE++qI
         YmOkAFOj2+iNRZQSMTi8n2P0I1bjijUhqYAydbqKPiHWiYcw+JooDRUYU2U8FF4LBFB7
         RBFxRrs5RQ4eH4GUSBB38EeqVQKMcXiKl0CnHJ3kozDAtU7pCOUqrlPmbSLUgCTWddB3
         d7utYYDqVg4gyu2EZlV2INm/ULuJEmsEXLCJbkw0mdSvXUD0P+nVc8os2O53R4gyOqRQ
         iGeqo25hkFNNkfAntTJLZqShOZsqTzbFXVKf/lxEG1d3eacQAp5wsv2JSosnwdj7FlLb
         RtfQ==
Received: by 10.180.100.2 with SMTP id eu2mr25312134wib.1.1337047707566;
        Mon, 14 May 2012 19:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.69.8.215] (suze.rez-metz.supelec.fr. [193.48.225.215])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex2sm61253709wib.8.2012.05.14.19.08.26
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 14 May 2012 19:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FB1BA9A.3010300@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 04:08:26 +0200
From: Thibault Suzanne <thi.suzanne@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <4FB1B5F3.3080908@riken.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4FB1B5F3.3080908@riken.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Any tool for unit tests as comments in OCaml source?

Hi

I don't know if it's a « gold standard », but Batteries uses qtest. The 
documentation (clear and concise in my opinion) can be found at 
http://batteries.vhugot.com/qtest/.

Thibault Suzanne

Le 15/05/2012 03:48, Francois Berenger a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> What's the gold standard in OCaml to have
> unit test as comments in source code in order
> for a tool to automatically extract them
> and generate a test suite?
>
> Thanks,
> F.
>