From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1951C7ED26 for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:55:11 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjcDALUHvU+yIGysnGdsb2JhbABDsGWDcwEBAQEBCAsJCRQnghUBAQUnCwEFQBELGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAIVh3UEunKLD4Iigx4Dmw2Maw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,645,1330902000"; d="scan'208";a="144862298" Received: from 9.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (HELO mo1.mail-out.ovh.net) ([178.32.108.172]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 May 2012 17:55:10 +0200 Received: from mail26.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 63DF910102BB for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:58:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 23 May 2012 17:55:09 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO ?138.231.81.46?) (romain%bardou.fr@138.231.81.46) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 23 May 2012 17:55:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4FBD0863.6020005@lsv.ens-cachan.fr> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:55:15 +0200 From: Romain Bardou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr X-Ovh-Mailout: 178.32.228.1 (mo1.mail-out.ovh.net) References: <4FBCFF05.5030500@lsv.ens-cachan.fr> <20120523155307.GA16965@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20120523155307.GA16965@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 602074975723968288 X-Ovh-Remote: 138.231.81.46 () X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeegjedrudekucetufdoteggodetrfdofgetucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfhrhhomheptfhomhgrihhnuceurghrughouhcuoegsrghrughouheslhhsvhdrvghnshdqtggrtghhrghnrdhfrheqnecujfgurhepkfffhfgfggfvufhfjggtgfesthekrgdttdefud X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeegjedrudekucetufdoteggodetrfdofgetucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfhrhhomheptfhomhgrihhnuceurghrughouhcuoegsrghrughouheslhhsvhdrvghnshdqtggrtghhrghnrdhfrheqnecujfgurhepkfffhfgfggfvufhfjggtgfesthekrgdttdefud X-Validation-by: bardou@lsv.ens-cachan.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Tuareg-mode and pipes | Le 23/05/2012 17:53, Eric Cooper a écrit : > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:15:17PM +0200, Romain Bardou wrote: >> Tuareg indents pattern-matching like this: >> >> match x with >> | Bla -> >> hello >> >> But the previous behavior of Tuareg, which I prefer, was: >> >> match x with >> | Bla -> >> hello >> >> [...] >> A related question is the following. I read here a few weeks ago a >> claim that the caml-mode was much better than the tuareg-mode. I was >> not able to find a comparison between these two modes, to support >> this claim, nor whether the caml-mode would fix the pipe behavior >> for me. Any comment here would be appreciated. > > I switched to caml-mode from tuareg for exactly this reason. I can > confirm that with its default settings, it indents in the second > style. > Thanks for your input. Do you miss anything from tuareg-mode or is your life just better now? Cheers, -- Romain Bardou