From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bobzhang1988@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF8C7ED26
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 23 May 2012 19:16:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlQBACQavU/RVaG2kGdsb2JhbAApGrQkCCIBAQEBCQkNBxQEI4IVAQEBBAEBAQ8CExEIARscAQEDDAYFCw0JFg8JAwIBAgEREQEFARwGDQEHAQEeh1wBAwsLKZwDCQOMIoJwhHwKGScNV4hxAQEEDIsThH4DlRiOFT2EJA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,645,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="159605606"
Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com ([209.85.161.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 23 May 2012 19:16:47 +0200
Received: by mail-gg0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m2so10475917ggn.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:cc
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=/qZ5UZCJEeRVdn0pSEWzO0OuyLRZNL7yBlbEPLY4/KI=;
        b=UdB50AwvZ3vpdPvc2DFE0CkjUCSwYXCAwp06zZ2+9qpiPpjRsZu3kDLSkUvogCxxnN
         hEVdWgF624IMzLOvEEljeqNzuJshE7wpjlhpUGDGMB5CKoaKhf5I3IHDu3rAESuPWEv+
         cNlHAiqQBvT8A66GUK7uPAHo8F/vLeaVhjSTlAGp9d5oLyCsNGEuYphnGUtcXPC5us2/
         xJ/aXrab3lU2tHVp5fUhTdODzdWNDvAIYeQlzL/YEWKABGfbTdtUzOObU0ISX4GFN8pI
         7Fo6elTwSXI7zkLdz6fA4RjgK6NuXPTzc2tRfkpwSb9dXZ5Y0j2jiXVCuIuGces3TIFC
         L1KA==
Received: by 10.236.152.41 with SMTP id c29mr32667079yhk.64.1337793407505;
        Wed, 23 May 2012 10:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Hongbos-MacBook-Air.local ([130.91.143.113])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u2sm100394793yhe.8.2012.05.23.10.16.45
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 23 May 2012 10:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FBD1B7C.9040209@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:16:44 -0400
From: Hongbo Zhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.caml.inria
To: Romain Bardou <bardou@lsv.ens-cachan.fr>
CC: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <4FBCFF05.5030500@lsv.ens-cachan.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4FBCFF05.5030500@lsv.ens-cachan.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Tuareg-mode and pipes |

On 5/23/12 11:15 AM, Romain Bardou wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> About two years ago, the following bug was reported:
> https://forge.ocamlcore.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=659&group_id=43&atid=255
>
>
> If you don't want to click, here is the issue. Tuareg indents
> pattern-matching like this:
>
> match x with
> | Bla ->
> hello
>
> But the previous behavior of Tuareg, which I prefer, was:
>
> match x with
> | Bla ->
> hello
>
> I have occasionally been updating my tuareg-mode, looking forward for
> this "tuareg-pipe-indent" variable (see the comments in the bug report),
> while patiently re-indenting pattern-matching by hand. But this
> variable, or any similar variable, never appeared.
>
> After two years, I'm becoming suspicious that something went wrong. Does
> anybody know what happened to the patch? Or how I can get my preferred
> behavior back?
>
> A related question is the following. I read here a few weeks ago a claim
> that the caml-mode was much better than the tuareg-mode. I was not able
> to find a comparison between these two modes, to support this claim, nor
> whether the caml-mode would fix the pipe behavior for me. Any comment
> here would be appreciated.
It's true.
I previously used tuareg-mode, switched to caml-mode then
>
> Cheers,
>