From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C7CBBC1 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:54:06 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkEEAFDX0EdIDvbwbWdsb2JhbACQcgwLBAUIChEEk0yHFA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,463,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="23484965" Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.240]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2008 14:54:05 +0100 Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so610554agc.3 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:54:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=yvySS+DWyYtgdl/uPeeP3MerGsbZSEnFcu1PHsSRPds=; b=jWUrCSOepnkoacVyDsK/5IdXTkC2dsTPH0zr7IwHCL4+O3VXolcMXQ5AHTeBRlL9PGvvkBCMeLFgZPkONTdDCBj0N26B61b4lWFKiWzi44lFfgVq/j2numIu4oC9Yz/fKajeCASskojTHkwpb2yFaxf3/UwVX8C5Ee6QQcM3FAQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=PWI/JpoMm4PKr59yVYsSWuijjzPkmCUt6oaQ+aejypHpcXSYsT3DnDgEqS0nrKpSq9nJ6LG7xMyLOxrT5W5QFUEzgxroLkrVQKhZBpMBBeM3LDyRPOp4TS22zxJrwD2TYc0BfjHLGcolUimr417C+jc2STXWEPC9YlVom6q0LBY= Received: by 10.142.73.8 with SMTP id v8mr528036wfa.68.1204898043559; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:54:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.148.14 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 05:54:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4a051d930803070554q43bdfbc9s4887ad5577a17ba1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 08:54:03 -0500 From: "Christopher L Conway" Sender: christopherleeconway@gmail.com To: "Soonho Kong" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Looking for full-fledged C++ Parser with OCAML interface Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, "Kwangkeun Yi" , grad@ropas.snu.ac.kr In-Reply-To: <47D0F155.4080909@ropas.snu.ac.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47D0F155.4080909@ropas.snu.ac.kr> X-Google-Sender-Auth: ae6327d98e80a75e X-Spam: no; 0.00; full-fledged:01 parser:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 bindings:01 parser:01 full-fledged:01 parsers:01 tews:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 researched:98 beginners:01 wrote:01 partial:01 Have you looked at LLVM? It does have OCaml bindings, although they were only partial when last I looked. I don't know "how fledged" their C++ parser is. Chris On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Soonho Kong wrote: > Hello everyone. I'm a graduate student majoring in program analysis. > > I'm looking for a full-fledged C++ parser with OCAML interface. Our team > researched some C++ parsers and found that > Olmar(http://www.cs.ru.nl/~tews/olmar/) was the best candidate among > them. I have two questions about it. > > 1. Is there a better candidate than Olmar? Please recommend one if > anyone knows about it. > > 2. If anyone have used Olmar before, I'd like to listen to your > experience with it. I'm curious of its tolerance with various C++ > dialects, robustness, and efficiency on the code used in real world. > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > > Best Regards > > Soonho Kong > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > >