From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D30CBDCB for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j89B9QZ0015631 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:09:27 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA21415 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:09:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j89B9Poi015599 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:09:26 +0200 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h26so125905wxd for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 04:09:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=D2HMISv5RsQ8SEZp7bs3ZBLA550O2pHsaHOvMdx5CfU27PSuEWlZ5d/N64RSTJTOm2hYagJsvtnOzk8aIUsSDLOPh4z7YFPjVeQ4XhVT8T0afzarEH36ypa7JTnujvcHDjOti5cGCxpMmMaUaK30aygTLIia+SP0EbnN//YTu7A= Received: by 10.70.40.14 with SMTP id n14mr2260wxn; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 04:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.51.20 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4a708d2050909040971b9e2e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:09:24 +0200 From: Lukasz Stafiniak Reply-To: lukstafi@gmail.com To: caml users Subject: Registering global roots Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43216D67.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43216D65.009 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; lukasz:01 lukasz:01 ...:98 roots:02 parameters:02 parameters:02 depends:04 size:95 computing:05 allocate:06 but:12 local:16 result:17 two:18 regards:20 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Not that it is essential, but... when you allocate the result (one value only), before computing it, you have two solutions: either register parameters, or make a local copy of them. Which one to choose depends on the total size of parameters. Best Regards, Lukasz