From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lukstafi@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E65BB83
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat,  9 Sep 2006 20:13:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k89IDsnm012976
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:13:55 +0200
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f25so1300197pyf
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=YlyEDZF2M2kf1r1tpT+VEm138QXXDK76znrr+NT4QmMpjqhbJamSvExlh6RNNarGNvQQ0uO2LxK0G1RDu8jbQj3nF6zNVQtD2QOKOBmKlfS8y4ZpowHWKzMrimqweFhMV84jNkeumLKt/wuS0RHWUnXKRp9FGJodobVfJ5YWnuU=
Received: by 10.35.46.11 with SMTP id y11mr5340427pyj;
        Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.121.3 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4a708d20609091113o3fa26178vd1326c667ea98700@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:13:54 +0200
From: "Lukasz Stafiniak" <lukstafi@gmail.com>
To: "caml users" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Toplevel exception backtrace
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 45030462.000 on nez-perce : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 45030462.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; lukasz:01 toplevel:01 backtrace:01 toplevel:01 stack:01 backtrace:01 lukasz:01 exception:01 exceptions:01 perhaps:04 function:08 something:14 run:15 hello:17 would:17 

Hello,

Perhaps the toplevel could be run with an option not to catch
exceptions, so the function stack backtrace would be reported on those
reaching toplevel? That would at least be something.

Best Regards,
Lukasz