From: "Lukasz Stafiniak" <lukstafi@gmail.com>
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unsoundness is essential
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:31:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a708d20710040831i292ac809kee8e0d091409c81d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1191451810.7218.86.camel@rosella.wigram>
A "sound program refuter" will not reject correct programs.
On 10/4/07, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> To be bold I propose type theorists have got it totally wrong.
>
> I want an unsound type system! It much better than the useless
> but 'sound' type system of Python, in which the type inference
> engine decides all values have type Object and proves
> in vacuuo that all programs are type-safe, only to do the
> dependent type checks at run time anyhow -- a cheat known
> as dynamic typing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-04 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 8:35 Locally-polymorphic exceptions [was: folding over a file] oleg
2007-10-03 11:27 ` kirillkh
2007-10-03 11:48 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel de Rauglaudre
2007-10-03 12:19 ` kirillkh
2007-10-03 12:32 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2007-10-03 14:34 ` kirillkh
2007-10-03 20:39 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-03 22:50 ` Unsoundness is essential skaller
2007-10-03 23:13 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Carette
2007-10-04 1:24 ` skaller
2007-10-04 11:26 ` David Allsopp
2007-10-04 12:45 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-10-04 15:07 ` skaller
2007-10-03 23:13 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2007-10-04 1:49 ` skaller
2007-10-03 23:28 ` Joshua D. Guttman
2007-10-04 1:52 ` skaller
2007-10-04 2:35 ` Brian Hurt
2007-10-04 7:46 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-04 8:56 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-10-04 14:49 ` skaller
2007-10-04 15:00 ` Harrison, John R
2007-10-04 15:29 ` Andrej Bauer
2007-10-04 16:25 ` skaller
2007-10-04 18:17 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-10-04 20:54 ` skaller
2007-10-04 22:24 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-10-04 16:37 ` skaller
2007-10-04 18:59 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-04 15:04 ` Andrej Bauer
2007-10-04 15:57 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-04 16:03 ` skaller
2007-10-04 20:02 ` Ken Rose
2007-10-04 21:00 ` skaller
2007-10-04 15:31 ` Lukasz Stafiniak [this message]
2007-10-04 17:56 ` rossberg
2007-10-04 19:56 ` skaller
2007-10-04 21:07 ` rossberg
2007-10-04 22:23 ` skaller
2007-10-05 2:48 ` Bárður Árantsson
2007-10-04 2:16 ` Locally-polymorphic exceptions [was: folding over a file] oleg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a708d20710040831i292ac809kee8e0d091409c81d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lukstafi@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).