From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C47BBAF
for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:52:23 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAOK2I0lKfSweimdsb2JhbACTGT4BAQEKCQwHDwWyBYEDi1gBAwEDgnY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,631,1220220000";
d="scan'208";a="17372016"
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30])
by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2008 15:52:22 +0100
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1454468yxj.3
for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:52:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=3b+ep3E4I2HViZ331dOKimzYWWCxeJZo2wYH9FLhBac=;
b=kBmJvZbB4WVitLQVHWGSEu4CO3HlFYwgDkn67AVJyzHzHN2eC7LUdSm7w7aywpzdGi
m/sbx6wej++I+JS066FO/dxI5EYiE6aPdblimIDUXYeFjJHkode3Yf1gk3mlhnXHh4PV
/W9q99o8XCU1j70FM9YpS3AH7JWYqcVVmSVWc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
:references;
b=dfoiaDSmk35JSjvZb23wm4/m3H7OW41pgAE53TnBMH+trDktGOrHslpBwVLthx1TW9
kSPzuEJFpXL/cvBRGL1pV3SOZSB5L4daT2oBYRv46bDmS/T8LrwKLeO4mlAZ7iwT9WT/
zXq0OCmqR3Au1AfX/+shSErYsiW3XbfRNjl7A=
Received: by 10.142.163.1 with SMTP id l1mr561870wfe.263.1227105959700;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.207.2 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4b5157c30811190645u1319e5dfnf518631f23e17824@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:45:59 +0100
From: "Paolo Donadeo"
To: "OCaml mailing list"
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
In-Reply-To: <8852F1B5-5D01-4C98-BEE8-1217F6EBFA41@erratique.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1227002178.6170.25.camel@Blefuscu>
<20081118100625.GA25627@annexia.org>
<421532A1-E2CA-404F-8387-E11DA9B3DE79@erratique.ch>
<20081119133652.GB1646@usha.takhisis.invalid>
<8852F1B5-5D01-4C98-BEE8-1217F6EBFA41@erratique.ch>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 python's:01 corresponds:01 complains:01 caml-list:01 tree:02 otoh:02 python:03 python:03 mentionned:03 hierarchy:03 hierarchy:03 library:03 library:03 docs:07
> Someone mentionned python's library, if it corresponds to this [1], then I
> see no hierarchy there (OTOH nobody tells me that python users are actually
> screaming for a hierarchy on their list).
The Python library hierarchy is very flat, for example all markup
tools are presented into a tree of packages [1] for user convenience.
Nobody actually complains about this situation.
[1] http://docs.python.org/library/markup.html
--
Paolo
~
~
:wq