From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C47BBAF for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:52:23 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAOK2I0lKfSweimdsb2JhbACTGT4BAQEKCQwHDwWyBYEDi1gBAwEDgnY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,631,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="17372016" Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2008 15:52:22 +0100 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1454468yxj.3 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:52:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3b+ep3E4I2HViZ331dOKimzYWWCxeJZo2wYH9FLhBac=; b=kBmJvZbB4WVitLQVHWGSEu4CO3HlFYwgDkn67AVJyzHzHN2eC7LUdSm7w7aywpzdGi m/sbx6wej++I+JS066FO/dxI5EYiE6aPdblimIDUXYeFjJHkode3Yf1gk3mlhnXHh4PV /W9q99o8XCU1j70FM9YpS3AH7JWYqcVVmSVWc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dfoiaDSmk35JSjvZb23wm4/m3H7OW41pgAE53TnBMH+trDktGOrHslpBwVLthx1TW9 kSPzuEJFpXL/cvBRGL1pV3SOZSB5L4daT2oBYRv46bDmS/T8LrwKLeO4mlAZ7iwT9WT/ zXq0OCmqR3Au1AfX/+shSErYsiW3XbfRNjl7A= Received: by 10.142.163.1 with SMTP id l1mr561870wfe.263.1227105959700; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.207.2 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:45:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4b5157c30811190645u1319e5dfnf518631f23e17824@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:45:59 +0100 From: "Paolo Donadeo" To: "OCaml mailing list" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included In-Reply-To: <8852F1B5-5D01-4C98-BEE8-1217F6EBFA41@erratique.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1227002178.6170.25.camel@Blefuscu> <20081118100625.GA25627@annexia.org> <421532A1-E2CA-404F-8387-E11DA9B3DE79@erratique.ch> <20081119133652.GB1646@usha.takhisis.invalid> <8852F1B5-5D01-4C98-BEE8-1217F6EBFA41@erratique.ch> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 python's:01 corresponds:01 complains:01 caml-list:01 tree:02 otoh:02 python:03 python:03 mentionned:03 hierarchy:03 hierarchy:03 library:03 library:03 docs:07 > Someone mentionned python's library, if it corresponds to this [1], then I > see no hierarchy there (OTOH nobody tells me that python users are actually > screaming for a hierarchy on their list). The Python library hierarchy is very flat, for example all markup tools are presented into a tree of packages [1] for user convenience. Nobody actually complains about this situation. [1] http://docs.python.org/library/markup.html -- Paolo ~ ~ :wq