From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8EBC37 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:03:54 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYFAHCrtErRVdPCkGdsb2JhbACCIWGOVYhzPwEBAQEJCQwHEwOgcYExjxsBAwIEhBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,416,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="33103888" Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.211.194]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2009 19:03:53 +0200 Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so2159007ywh.15 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:03:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NpXiIWncReiD0WDePaS+Efgq6tTJvUwUeTs0F5lSJWY=; b=KqJzPmD08hkPNcu+7dzpB94xRdvw+EJU0D+H4mFfOLu6IE7mW2Rmb4GEhyy59m7Ybj oVVcSv/hxr+19g8hNlFdF3J7sMR24OhQ0zIcoVkPxyoV0zare5NNvmHeQDxwHtFPGWE5 UeWtfsL4xbo3+kV/r8xqVbjvYYuiuDEK0uOAc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bXtMFuWqbj0KiCM5O+twIZ/N3f+YUgewhTVaQwCyrdSUY5DEnv4bdQgXUEaZBHR6DZ eTHGawsU2XK7q+SAyTYNV4wqU5Qem0qy2jNnknZx8YM3wQPXRgAxznLf1hRYDBG9XAwU E2CjRPGGOELoirhOhY2q8skktOeohtcUkFMlg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.50.19 with SMTP id c19mr2835800ank.197.1253379832692; Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:03:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909191623.16363.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <20090919005953.20724aglhumqekfd@webmail.in-berlin.de> <200909191623.16363.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:03:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4d1b2df20909191003h357f3b8fr97dee44022c81034@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Scilab: Why not written in OCaml? From: Philippe Wang To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: no; 0.00; scilab:01 ocaml:01 bigloo:01 compiler:01 www-sop:01 bigloo:01 inria's:01 ocaml:01 2009:98 2009:98 dog:98 frog:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 Why not use Bigloo? It's a efficient scheme compiler, also developed at INR= IA. http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/ Just kidding, --=20 Philippe Wang mail@philippewang.info On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Saturday 19 September 2009 08:39:14 St=E9phane Lescuyer wrote: >> > ...and from INRIA's view I would think: they have developed >> > OCaml, but do not use it for their own developments.... >> > ... strange, isn't it? >> >> I think you don't quite realize how big an institute the INRIA is : >> >> http://www.inria.fr/inria/enbref.en.html > > On the contrary, the bigger INRIA is the more valuable it would be for th= em to > eat their own dog food. If OCaml had more users in INRIA it would garner = more > useful feedback and would be more likely to get funding. > > -- > Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e >