From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <philippe.wang.lists@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F50BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:36:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsADAPsuu0rRVdPEk2dsb2JhbACDAo5HiHc/AQEBAQkJCgkTA6pmgTGPcwEDAgSEFwU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,446,1249250400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="36754489"
Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.211.196])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2009 17:36:19 +0200
Received: by ywh34 with SMTP id 34so1821679ywh.1
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=DH5LlXKV6HM1Xr83VAT7MYUFdYkU9waN9fGLCsQUIxs=;
        b=r4/RsJ6Wg4HTOlp7Y3WB4S0J4SuOdjsxSl9wCy5oimiYBIS97wGwYbONTqN7sdPNLc
         Geij9ZyICoEWA4sCdmx76EeldtnaxQk3R2rcgluuI69TD2cPFD7A9+FFRC4gFFxgfJ1b
         yZ+JcyoOz9DC1wXiOgiL7kmFoo9eWPM5FDmNo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=batmfLkCyoITiK7cGENiCJWPtdWO0H0qX9mSPATkUWB5BSpUSXSitl9xSgbuwTwHYJ
         rLN4IT9wKnUmKRl2fjbS+5fWGVMFlGMNbq1PT1DgM3iWgGlNfSoLeidIA7MwROn5wDp8
         yr2QcrWM1UGK6zzP1fGWP8tZCvE4YMDUannXQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.129.13 with SMTP id b13mr4449993and.189.1253806578066; 
	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200909241252.24209.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
References: <D221B09D-9309-4CCF-90E4-CCEDF595BFE2@lip6.fr>
	 <200909240247.17560.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
	 <60112.70.26.45.183.1253786457.squirrel@pegasus.carleton.ca>
	 <200909241252.24209.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:36:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4d1b2df20909240836n28d91223hc09bc6ba4daaffcc@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OC4MC : OCaml for Multicore architectures
From: Philippe Wang <philippe.wang.lists@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 jocaml:01 jocaml:01 parallelism:01 caml-list:01 latency:01 concurrency:04 concurrency:04 i'm:09 maybe:10 philippe:11 philippe:11 minimizing:13 does:14 

>> I'm not too familiar with concurrency in ocaml.
>> How does OC4MC compare with JoCaml?
>
> JoCaml is all about concurrency: minimizing latency. Oc4mc is all about
> parallelism: maximizing throughput.

Maybe a nice thing would be to have both in one piece...

--
Philippe Wang
   mail@philippewang.info