From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA10974; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:35:09 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA10959 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:35:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from staff.gtmd.com (adsl-63-195-80-23.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.80.23]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f38KZ6D24219 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:35:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from aria.chasm.org (aria [192.168.0.3]) by staff.gtmd.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA35727 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:34:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from charles@chasm.org) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010408133532.029e0460@chasm.org> X-Sender: charles@chasm.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 13:37:21 -0700 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Charles Martin Subject: Re: [Caml-list] variant with tuple arg in pattern match? In-Reply-To: <200104081945.VAA09757@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <20010407174259.A14454@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > > Sounds good to me. Now, for consistency, shouldn't you do the same > > for function arguments? ;-) > >I would suggest the other way round: as we already did for functions, >we should prefer the curried syntax for constructors. Yes, yes, yes please! ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr