From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA00420; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:04:11 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA32703 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:04:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.helpinhand.com ([195.204.121.12]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g9BC49512691 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:04:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [80.111.5.68] (HELO daniello.helpinhand.com) by mail.helpinhand.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.2) with ESMTP id 761004; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:06:55 +0200 X-URL: Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20021011140155.01ac29c8@helpinhand.com> X-Sender: hallvard@helpinhand.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:09:34 +0200 To: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr From: Hallvard Ystad Subject: [Caml-list] List configs (was: building OCaml under MinGW) Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20021011134601.A6644@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <5.1.1.6.2.20021011133635.029ac7c8@helpinhand.com> <5.1.1.6.2.20021011133635.029ac7c8@helpinhand.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi Lists like caml-list@inria.fr are a wonderful place to get help, but I would= like to comment on the way that list is set up. There is no Reply-to: field= in the headers, so when I click "reply" in my e-mail-reader,= caml-list@inria.fr is not addressed, but only the sender of the message. I= have to manually change it each time. I dislike that (and I hate bugging= people with e-mails that should go directly to the list). Is this really= ment to be so? Second, the prefix [Caml-list] does not always appear first in the subject= line, but could be anywhere. This makes filtering less obvious. Is this= also ment to be so? Regards, ~HY Dixit Xavier Leroy (13.46 11.10.2002): >> I tried this week with mingw, but didn't manage. After solving a few >> problems discussed on this list, I didn't succeed in finding out why >> the file ocamlrun.a wasn't present. I used the CVS source files in >> my last attempt, but that didn't help. So I'm hopelessly stranded, >> and on the point of giving up. > >I'm afraid I can't diagnose your problem offline. There is one known >bug that was discussed on this list (you have to do=20 > make -f Makefile.nt jumptbl.h >manually in byterun/), but apart from this it should work if you >follow the instructions in README.win32. In particular, I'd advise to >compile under Cygwin (but with the -mno-cygwin option to gcc) >rather than under Mingw + Msys. > >> Oh, and by the way: If I should be so lucky as to manage to compile >> it, and then to build Windows native executables, will client >> machines still need mingw to run these files? I.e. will these >> Windows native executables really be Windows native executables, and >> not rely on any third party software? > >No to the first question. Yes to the second. (Unless your program >explicitly requires third-party libraries, e.g. TCL/TK if you use >Labltk.) > >- Xavier Leroy >------------------- >To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives:= http://caml.inria.fr >Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:= http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ >Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners=20 Pr=E6tera censeo Carthaginem esse delendam ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners