From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p71F3Zxi031732 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:03:36 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AioCABi/Nk7RVaE2kGdsb2JhbAAnGphRjwgIFAEBAQEJCQ0HFAQhgUABAQEBAgESAiYGAQE3AQQLCzQSNAEFARw7h0oCAiOiSwqPAwGOBAWFY1+fSzyDXg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,300,1309730400"; d="scan'208";a="104437285" Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com ([209.85.161.54]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 01 Aug 2011 17:03:30 +0200 Received: by mail-fx0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 4so9199060fxe.27 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:03:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Cw0hi+6jEUcH40jjEaxmEzAOMJI4lPK0HEEencIAhq4=; b=Q6jkuTX6IMYrhD2K53UbPLk39YMOaK/ozHFLFCkHXcLyX84Ho3jqLCZoXJURxWdV+f y1/Px0RMoo+V+vFtORDvUF6JWYNT3pBmhQTSELJcnpD2iEwFxCHK+2NX9TTklyd+emMC vboRUyiY1S2u6EL+0lZllh2x091eSo/jNs3yA= Received: by 10.223.86.76 with SMTP id r12mr6594020fal.80.1312211010491; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:03:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coruscant.kosmos.all (ip-95-223-170-32.unitymediagroup.de [95.223.170.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm2930352fak.10.2011.08.01.08.03.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Benedikt Meurer In-Reply-To: <93199F3B-E9CF-4D93-9B2B-BAAB03F4FC08@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:03:22 +0200 Cc: Marcell Fischbach Message-Id: <5011A83F-4205-4C88-BDFD-098D084A1DC2@googlemail.com> References: <93199F3B-E9CF-4D93-9B2B-BAAB03F4FC08@googlemail.com> To: caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id p71F3Zxi031732 Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Linear Scan Register Allocator for ocamlopt/ocamlnat On Aug 1, 2011, at 16:53 , Benedikt Meurer wrote: > The linear scan implementation reuses as much of the existing ocamlopt functionality as possible, so additional maintenance overhead should be manageable. Comments and suggestions are welcome of course. Please keep Marcell CC'ed with any replies as he's not subscribed to the list. Mantis ticket created: http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5324