caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongbo Zhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Beware of compiler internals (Was: ocamldoc for ocaml's compiler?)
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:11:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50178506.4070903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBGyCV9XCWfAjsNwEM7-_bPviFfLv3PxDUJFdXzwHEcrWA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Gabriel,
    There are a lot of things to explore having compiler as libraries. 
(another advantage compared with Haskell)
Backward in-compatible is a minor issue if there's more documentation.

Best -- Hongbo Zhang
On 7/30/12 6:07 PM, Gabriel Scherer wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> The new 4.00 release has added fairly interesting feature relying on
> the compiler internals: the new -bin-annot option allowing to export
> and manipulate the typedtree of an OCaml program has already stirred
> interest among tools writers (see Jun Furuse's OCamlspotter changes,
> or the questions of Hongbo Zhang).
>
> I just wanted to remark that the interface those tools expose are
> *not* stabilized and will *certainly* change before the next OCaml
> release: this code is very young, not reliable (don't expect all
> features to work as advertized), and flaws will certainly be
> discovered and fixed.
>
> To my knowledge, there is no compatibility guarantee coming from the
> compiler writers. Please keep that in mind when experimenting with
> those features: they are experimental, and if you decide to rely on
> them everyone will be interested in your feedback, but you're on your
> own and you should expect maintenance work (or even feature loss)
> during the next few releases.
>
> Regards -- from San Francisco.
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Hongbo Zhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/25/12 11:13 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/25/12 7:12 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi List,
>>>>     Did anyone have a try to build ocamldoc's documentation for ocaml's
>>>> compiler?
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>>
>>> Hi, I managed to build documentation for ocaml compiler. Another problem
>>> comes that ocamldoc prefers .mli to .ml which renders -keep-code not
>>> useful.
>>> Any ideas?
>>> Once I finished, if people interested, I would be happy to share.
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>> Hi,
>>     I put it here
>> http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~hongboz/hongbo_zhang_files/typing.docdir/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
>> https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list
>> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>>
>



      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-31  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-30 22:07 [Caml-list] " Gabriel Scherer
2012-07-31  7:11 ` Hongbo Zhang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50178506.4070903@gmail.com \
    --to=bobzhang1988@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).