On 8/26/12 11:05 AM, Gabriel Scherer wrote:
Hi Gabriel,
   Sorry for the noise, it turns out that I upgraded my ocalmfind, and 
forget to modify findlib.conf.
ocamlfind still picks 'ocamlc' instead of 'ocamlc.opt'.
   There's a huge performance difference(10x) between ocamlc.opt and ocamlc.
Thanks!
> You could try compiling a native OCaml compiler executable with 
> profiling option (-p) (setting that up might be a pain, though).
>
> Before that you could try to only typecheck the file (option "-i") to 
> know whether it's the type-checking or code generation that is 
> problematic. (-i causes type printing as well, so for very large types 
> that are internally shared it can be its own source of slowness)
>
> If it was in code generation, that would most likely only occur during 
> when compiling to native code. Have you noticed the performance 
> bottleneck with compilation to bytecode as well?
>
> (Of course using the natively-compiled versions of your compilers will 
> also speed up performance, but if your generated code hits one of the 
> source of exponential behavior of the compiler you're out of luck anyway.)
>
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Hongbo Zhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com 
> <mailto:bobzhang1988@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi List,
>        I have a file which is only 410 lines, the compilation process
>     takes nearly 1 minutes. Before my refactoring, it's compiled very
>     fast.
>        Is there a way to know which part the compiler spend most time in ?
>        Many Thanks
>
>     -- 
>     Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
>     https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list
>     Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>     Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>