From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thelema314@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A697ED7A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:27:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  thelema314@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  thelema314@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUCABVXXlDRVd+2m2dsb2JhbABFhUS4YQgjAQEBAQEICQsJFCeCIAEBAQQSAiQIARsQCgQDDAYFCw0JJQ8CEhEBBQEcEwgBARAOh1ABAw+ZfAkDjCaCdYQhChknDVmIdAEFDIsQgwqDIAOVZYVhiGM/hCM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,469,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="174246136"
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 23 Sep 2012 02:27:59 +0200
Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so9008869iea.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Qpq7hGqBiEcNvKxXiXJbRsj3j7wCtlMKUjDtuC5//Ro=;
        b=V3YgXjCN5jFu4ysuCMpqpxuHiG8kYFe5eHBfr06hTUlo8yoijZJBLUyww+GInoylzz
         ZZCAUYTW6p3kVyFgq5FJJ943uoUiUT66/pt/SEJJc6/B1gSPT/Ly84Mnx706dS7FvUMX
         mD2OssdElFzFmOWyN/zkIiX4Z0TSJx5vWcwQxYcDJ4O3eiD1zFRKXOlGn0YnNX1JY+G6
         F8tigkFfXjfgpV1A9uhgp+ZbRmx1LN0YTLwFjT09DSM/zn+xdPeQbVuwSFLqTAHfleYO
         Ou/04+wm9iGl3EXzExR2YNc5+z1MNrB7X9Yh1p/QERd+FzmM/yaMoDXtiblvBNt+LsM/
         tHOg==
Received: by 10.50.196.231 with SMTP id ip7mr2045681igc.7.1348360077982;
        Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.24.238] ([50.33.151.22])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ua2sm4645593igb.7.2012.09.22.17.27.53
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <505E578A.10207@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:27:54 -0400
From: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <5050A32C.9090809@inria.fr> <20120917.222210.832076572642519350.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be> <505C6EAF.5080301@inria.fr> <CAF1Sy-HacK=k0MRhD74qABJwuheVqTWNjckzLr0E_dcJJnrZoA@mail.gmail.com> <505DBBB3.10105@inria.fr> <CAF1Sy-H_03zcCKcbqebq3XqSA6OdcjBEhhnnAMhgp_DX97NP4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF1Sy-H_03zcCKcbqebq3XqSA6OdcjBEhhnnAMhgp_DX97NP4A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Tuareg mode: Indentation of application arguments

On 9/22/2012 2:13 PM, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
> ... indentation is something that requires
> human intelligence (and good indentation is an art rather than
> science).
I admit that under some circumstances, code can be made easier to read 
by giving it crafted indentation. But having a single indentation 
standard (and probably code layout) for all OCaml code would be better.  
In exchange for the occasional inability to indent code for extra 
readability (maybe comments would suffice instead), we would gain a 
community-wide improvement in our ability to read each others' code.

E.