From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thelema314@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C9E67ED7A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:33:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  thelema314@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  thelema314@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.223.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="thelema314@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUCAChYXlDRVd+2m2dsb2JhbABFhUS4YQgjAQEBAQEICQsJFCeCIAEBAQQSAiQIARscAgMMBgULDQkWDwkDAgECARERAQUBHBMIAQEeh1ABAw+ZfQkDjCaCdYQhChknDVmIdAEFDIsQgwqDIAOVZYVhiGM/hCM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,469,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="174246388"
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 23 Sep 2012 02:33:05 +0200
Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10so9015174iea.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=MLMEenX15nnpuNPggTMKt3dw2v27fPSijXOMqJVcxbk=;
        b=tUxm4UFBijS/QcNcaHauLvZU+VZ4ebB7noCBZQ4Z+iAQBYJWVrC5W8ykHwjvsda354
         PpAIqyKbZ+RSbNPXYi6OmbyE9l/dewk+1Q8S8Ud4AO+WbnwFRF75A3i0mPg2PRlO84X6
         o/Pych0gEkY8wEXlPc2BCQTKjURwWQPfzBKn9gtE0x0jKBfeZ0RTFpk5kbvVzK3F6GQj
         3/uCbtzTkNCG0m0vSYrKcMMjlwhk+F96xxDalSVYnjmWxxv5cYL1bNjW4Rs1fX8aIntW
         I81me8TL7O4KSbQhDyNuXo75otqFVGTfp0n8CLBoRLQihzCwuuxFVysUNY4xUU0lzSlB
         EQ+g==
Received: by 10.50.140.65 with SMTP id re1mr2021540igb.68.1348360384711;
        Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.24.238] ([50.33.151.22])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a10sm4690331igd.1.2012.09.22.17.33.02
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <505E58BD.3030909@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:33:01 -0400
From: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <sympa.1348346044.7674.559@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <sympa.1348346044.7674.559@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Build OCaml on linux

On 9/22/2012 4:58 PM, Didier Cassirame wrote:
> The first line of the bytecode executable is just a hint for the shell to
> locate the bytecode interpreter.
it might not hurt to have the default hint to the shell be: 
#!/usr/bin/env ocamlrun
This would make it harder to have multiple OCaml installations and run 
the compiler of one while the PATH is set to the other, but this is a 
pretty edge case.  Is there any other problem with doing this?

E.